ABSTRACT
Background. Literature shows early intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) antimicrobial transition for infective endocarditis (IE) and bone and joint infection (BJI) is noninferior to prolonged IV antimicrobial therapy. COVID-19 pandemic peaks resulted in critical shortages of staffed hospital beds spurring innovation. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), a well-established program using prolonged IV antimicrobials, faces challenges such as infusion resource needs and social circumstance limitations. Complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) uses PO in place of IV antimicrobials. We hypothesized rapid adoption of COpAT would decrease hospital length of stay and open beds while retaining satisfactory clinical outcomes. Methods. COpAT protocols (Image 1) and guidelines by infection type and isolated organism (Image 2) were created. Hospitalized patients including persons who inject drugs (PWID) were evaluated for IV to PO antimicrobial transition by an infectious diseases (ID) physician and then followed by an ID physician-pharmacist team. Demographic, ID, and clinical outcome data for the first 100 COpAT patients between December 2020 and February 2022 were obtained by retrospective chart review. Image 1. COpAT Inpatient and Outpatient Protocols Image 2. COpAT Guidelines by Infection Type and Isolated Organism MSSA = methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus;MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus;spp. = species;TMP/SMX = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole;DS = double strength;SSTI = skin and soft tissue infection;CAP = community-acquired pneumonia Results. PWID accounted for 78% of COpAT patients. BJI followed by mixed infection (IE and BJI) was most prevalent (Image 3) with bacteremia in 53% of cases. Staphylococcus aureus was most frequently isolated (Image 4). Oral linezolid and fluoroquinolones, often in combination, were most commonly used. IV and PO antimicrobials were taken for a median 28 and 14 days, respectively. The COpAT program saved 1425 IV antimicrobial and 1363 hospital days. Assuming daily inpatient cost of $2050, cost avoided was $2,794,150. COpAT patients participated in ID follow-up and adhered to PO antimicrobials with low 30-day readmission rates (Image 5). Image 3. Infection Type Image 4. Isolated Organism CoNS = coagulase-negative staphylococci Image 5. Clinical Outcomes Conclusion. In a sample of 100 COpAT patients including PWID, IV to PO antimicrobial transition safely saved hospital days and mitigated critical bed shortages during pandemic peaks. A successful COpAT program requires a multidisciplinary group: close ID physician-pharmacist collaboration extending to OPAT and antimicrobial stewardship teams. With a COpAT program in place, even earlier IV to PO antimicrobial transitions should be studied.
ABSTRACT
Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic, many changes were made in healthcare institutions including but not limited to canceling elective surgeries, limiting face-to-face clinic visits, and implementing visitor restrictions. Phased reopening began at West Virginia University (WVU) Medicine on May 25, 2020. While preparing for transition, concern was raised regarding potential for more employee exposures to persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In West Virginia (WV), we did not get the predicted surge of SARS-CoV-2. Current cumulative percent positivity for SARS-CoV-2 PCR in WV is 2332 positives of 133,142 tests (1.75%). We provided appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including controlled air purifying respirators for all healthcare workers (HCW) caring for persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 from the beginning. Policies requiring masks for all HCW and patients took effect on March 27, 2020 and April 29, 2020, respectively. We hypothesized that due to appropriate PPE use there would be no difference in SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity in HCW working in high versus low risk areas. Methods: Serum samples from 1042 randomly selected HCW across 4 WVU Medicine hospitals, ranging from 170 to 690 beds with 121 cumulative SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients at the time of the study, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG between May 26, 2020 and June 5, 2020. Physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists were characterized as high or low risk based on work location. Environmental services (EVS) workers were included but not risk-stratified. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on demographics, chronic medical conditions, symptoms, and exposures. Results: SARS-CoV-2 IgG was positive in 9 of 1042 (0.86%) randomly selected HCW. Seroprevalence was lower in high risk 5/835 (0.60%) versus low risk 4/176 (2.27%) group. This was not statistically significant. No EVS workers tested positive 0/31 (0%). Of 9 HCW who tested positive, 2 had previously tested positive for SARSCoV- 2 PCR. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence in a large sample of HCW across 4 WVU Medicine hospitals was low (0.86%). Low seroprevalence among HCW in high risk areas may be related to appropriate PPE use. Seroprevalence in HCW not caring for patients with COVID-19 could be from community or other inadvertent exposure.